"HERE WE GO AGAIN" ray charles
The phone will ring again
I'll be her fool again
One more time
Well AMP-OHIO called again and we presently have a whole new cast of characters from a 'new' city manager and six new council people.
This time with AMP called with a scheme called AMI? The only thing you need to be aware of it will cost ratepayer's 4.5 million dollars for smart meters, installation and monitoring.
These funds to pay for this will come out of one of our numerous electric funds that you have paid into through your electric purchases over time.
I have sent all council people my opposition to this deal along with our city manager. With a promise to even having NO AMP signs printed and located throughout the city.
The city manager offered to have a conversation about AMI, well I've heard it all before and the city is 5 million dollars poorer over AMP-OHIO deals. You wonder what they have to do for this administration to say "No Thank-You".
It's almost as if that 4.5 M is burning a hole in someone's pocket? Look here's an idea use that 4.5 million to cut our electric cost rates? A reverse Power Factor.
I(n the coming months the city must present reasons this investment will benefit the stockholder's of the Painesville Electric Co. (US) not them or AMP-OHIO.
Do you think this issue is enough to propose they not get involved? Please let me know.
Ever wonder why they had no public showing of the new City Works Facility?
Wonder if Napoleon, Ohio has smart meters?
AMP's Board of Trustees explore four scenarios that members might follow;
1. Independent action with individual technology deployment at each utility.
2. Independent action and selection of a vendor-provided hosting solution.
3. Joint action and selection of a single vendor-provided hosting solution.
4. Joint action and deployment of a single shared set of technologies
* AMP-OHIO picked #4 for us.
Another question to ask your council person what does Blueridge Infrastructure Services, have to do with this. As well as the Silver Spring Network?