Wednesday, September 8, 2010

"WISHIN' AND HOPIN' " dusty springfield

When it comes to any community that is in the AMP-OHIO circle of "take and pay" there sure is a lot of wishin'... hopin'... and sure to be plenty of Praying.
I came across this article in the Martinsville Bulletin, where for some reason their city manager could get the President of AMP-OHIO to come to their fair city and explain certain costs along with the liabilities of the Meigs AMPGS plant. The key words in this article seems to be that 'even if we screwed up Meigs we're still going to save you millions in the coming years'. Really? Why wouldn't you screw something up in the future? As far as "rolling" expenses into the gas plant from the coal plant? That's sorta like trading in your vehicle that you still owe $5000.[ that's worth $500.00] and it will be assumed in your new loan. Clever bunch. Also take note it seems the only way to control your destiny is to have control of the power facilities? If that's true why would they want us to spend over a million dollars on ways to conserve energy?
Another interesting fact I found out the coal plant was going to be a 24/7 operation yet the proposed gas plant Will only operate 7am to 11pm 5 days a week, why?
Our city manager better get a crash course in electricity, and AMP-OHIO had better be ready for a lot of questions on the horizon. In the mean-time could someone take that shovel out of her hand? She just continues to dig deeper, with no clue.
One thing I keep thinking about as I print these news-paper stories, have you ever read anything or any mention of AMP-OHIO losing any money?

##################################################################################

Council gets AMP briefing


City Electric Department Superintendent Dennis Bowles (right) introduces Marc Gerken, P.E. president and CEO of American Muncipal Power Inc., to Martinsville City Council at Tuesday’s meeting. (Bulletin photo by Mike Wray)
Wednesday, August 25, 2010

By MICKEY POWELL - Bulletin Staff Writer

Martinsville will save millions of dollars on its future wholesale power costs even if it chooses to pay back its share of expenses toward a ceased power plant project without participating in future projects.


That is what City Manager Clarence Monday determined when Martinsville City Council on Tuesday heard a presentation by American Municipal Power (AMP) executives about the city’s involvement with the organization and three power projects.

According to AMP projections, by participating in one of the three, the Prairie State Energy Campus in Illinois, Martinsville will save $5.4 million on wholesale electricity costs during the first 14 years of the plant’s operation.

Through 2020, the city will save $5.6 million on wholesale power costs by AMP’s recent decision to enter into contracts to buy electricity on the wholesale market. That will replace power that another project, the discontinued AMPGS project in Ohio, would have produced, projections show.

Monday said the latter savings results from a decline in market prices due to the recent economic downturn.

The total savings is $11 million, Monday noted.

AMP officials on Tuesday estimated Martinsville’s share of the development costs toward AMPGS at $1.7 million. That is down from the original estimate of $2.08 million.

They did not say how soon the city will find out exactly how much it owes. Monday confirmed after the meeting that it could be many months due to ongoing negotiations with contractors and potential litigation.

For that reason, figuring out the exact cost is “very complicated,” said Pam Sullivan, AMP’s vice president of marketing and operations.

Through negotiations and perhaps litigation, “we’re going to try to get your money back” — as much of it as possible, AMP President and Chief Executive Officer Marc Gerken added.

But the city will be liable for whatever it owes toward the project, he said.

The city can pay whatever it owes toward AMPGS through future electricity purchases from the wholesale market through AMP, rolling the expense into a natural gas-fired plant that AMP now plans for the AMPGS site, or not taking part in another project but paying the cost in payments over an unspecified period of time, according to Monday and officials with the organization.

AMPGS was to have been a coal-fired facility, like Prairie State.

Even if the city chooses the latter option, it still could save about $9.3 million overall on its future wholesale electricity costs, Monday reasoned.

AMP is an Ohio-based, not-for-profit organization owned by its 128 member localities, including Martinsville, through which the city has bought wholesale electricity since 2006. The city electric department then provides the power to its residential, commercial and industrial customers.

In 2008, the council entered into 50-year agreements to buy power from three AMP projects being developed — AMPGS, Prairie State and the three hydrodams on the Ohio River. AMP was to own or partly own each project.

City officials had estimated that Martinsville would spend about $3.5 million annually toward the plants, mainly through the cost of power bought from them. It is not yet known how discontinuing AMPGS will affect that.

Costs for each of the projects have been higher than expected.

In late November, AMP canceled plans to build AMPGS after contractors’ cost estimates rose 47 percent.

AMP realized “we could buy power on the market” for less money, Gerken said.

Construction has begun on Prairie State and two of the three hydrodams. Prairie State is under contract to be completed in December 2011 and two hydrodams are to be finished by September 2014, officials said. The other dam is in the permitting process.

Martinsville would pay its share of development costs toward those plants through its purchases of power they generate, officials have said.

Despite the projects’ cost increases, a consultant from the Blue Ridge Power Agency told the council that AMP — including participation in the projects — remains Martinsville’s best option for buying wholesale power in the future.

More coverage of the AMP discussion will be published in the Martinsville Bulletin on Thursday.

###################################################################################

13 Comments:

At September 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

AMPTHINK...
This is how these people justify all Amp communities losing money in Meigs County. This is THEIR news release.
The combination of these efforts will allow Participants the opportunity to RECOUP more than 100 million dollars with savings from reduced power supply costs. [for a portion of Participants power needs as compared to AMPGS coal project] projected costs through 2020 and utilzation of the Meigs County Investment site investment.

In other words they want credit for stopping Meigs County because it would cost you a whole lot more for your investment than to buy on the open market. So much for controlling the source of power?
You have to also wonder what crystal ball these thiefs use?

 
At September 10, 2010 at 5:18 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is it just me but out of Lake, Geauga, and Ashtabula Countys only Painesville, a town of 18,000 has an electric company? The other250,000 people seem to get along fine without the headache.

 
At September 11, 2010 at 10:44 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:18 WHAT, ASK THEM HOW HIGH THERE BILLS ARE.

 
At September 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes and ask them how high their school rank, ask them about the state of the art their community center's are. ask them about their indoor and outdoor pools? I could go on and on but for some reason they seem to do fine without the headache. How high our your bills lets compare, then tell me its worth it. Funny you would think the city would show you a power bill compared to the same use in Fairport. They don't because it's not that great a difference, then add in water and sewer and there is no saving. Forget the 40% saving on utility Rita has made sure to close the gap. Does Painesville power give a discount for an all electric homes, did they ever?

 
At September 17, 2010 at 10:28 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, isn't a vote on joining the AMP - Ohio energy savings program due pretty soon? And doesn't Zaramba have to offer a plan for the hospital site pretty soon too? Are we going to see these items rushed thru because the city manager will be in a hurry again? Hope she puts this stuff in a packet with enough time for council to review THOROUGHLY before a vote is called for.

 
At September 17, 2010 at 6:32 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

AMP-OHIO energy program is not on the agenda? Not enough yes votes? We were told they needed to know by the end of September. What can Zaramba propose? The housing market is still in the dumps, so what does he do build a couple of models wait, and hope?
Checking the agenda for Monday the new street plans are not even mentioned.
Reading the News-Herald comment section I was lumped in with what were called "Negative" people in Painesville. I couldn't be happier than to be mentioned with the other three, along with many more that have seen enough.

 
At September 19, 2010 at 2:18 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have two words: charter change.

Six more words: to get McMahon out of office.

 
At September 19, 2010 at 9:41 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have a question about the upcoming Charter Change that will be on the Nov. ballot.

Painesville City — proposed charter amendment by petition — provides that in November 2013, and quadrennially thereafter, the at-large councilpersons shall be elected so as to provide that the term of one councilperson at large will commence on the first day of January 2014 and quadrennially thereafter.

My question is: Who does this benefit? Why is this important?

 
At September 19, 2010 at 3:27 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

I guess first off anyone who wants to run for a council at large seat.
You need more signatures to get on the ballot in Painesville then you do in Mentor or other surrounding communities. You don't even need that amount to run for County Commissioner.
Second if you do it this way you run against a certain incumbent. Maybe you don't think candidate #2 is doing his job but you think the candidate#1 presently serving in the first slot is doing his job. Why run against him or her?
First off I am not advocate of this measure but presently some people are looking for any way to get things changed around here.
Lets face it we don't have term limits and its near impossible to run against an incumbent.
Why are people spending the amount of money for this part- time job?

 
At September 24, 2010 at 1:58 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see in today's News-Herald that the city bowed out of AMP's dumb money-wasting, electricity-saving lessons that they are using as a smoke screen for losing all of our money. That's the first thing I've seen done right here in a long time.

But didn't McMahon just sign us up for another deal with AMP? If so, what, please.

 
At September 24, 2010 at 3:52 AM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

Just the tip of the iceberg. We will also have to pay some of the cost of the Gorsuch Plant closing. I want the real numbers we will end up paying not this $$4000 joke.
Meigs County will be the next big item wait until you see the costs we owe there, without as much as a D cell battery to show for it. Next month AMP-OHIO representatives will make a presentation to council. Wonder if we will be allowed to ask questions?

 
At September 24, 2010 at 12:10 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is 1:58. Thanks for the information, Term, but didn't she just sign us up for a new deal with AMP?

Okay, I found the 8/12/10 article in The News-Herald. It's the Prairie State Energy Campus, a coal-fired plant under construction in southern Illinois. Ohio Citizen Action is a grassroots organization speaking out against this because of the rising costs. McMahon has us involved in this one, too. Apparantly there is just no end to this AMP nightmare with McMahon. What do you know about this one, Term?

Will the AMP presentation next month be during the regular council meeting?

 
At September 24, 2010 at 1:18 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

I believe it will be a special meeting when I find out the date and time I will post it.
Praire States yes we have a sizable investment there along with a two hydro- projects. I have mentioned many times this project and Meigs County. Google it it's one massive venture.
The city manager will state that council voted for this then the next question should be WHO recommended it? They pretty much follow her suggestions.
In all honesty at the time we got involved with this project 5 or 6 years ago it seemed like a good idea. What we should be watching is Painesville getting out of the production of power and only wanting to be distributors.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home