Sunday, June 6, 2010

"OYE COMO VA" santana

"Hows it goin"
Here is an interesting read. I like for anyone to chime in. My own personal thoughts are that the illegals are costing the American Taxpayer a ton of money in social services, plus the fact that a large portion of their income is sent back to Mexico.

WHAT IF THEY WENT HOME?
Written by Rita Lingwood
Friday, 30 November 2007

Recently, Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News, wrote a column titled, Mexican Visitor's Lament.

She interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while she was visiting Denver . Hernandez said, "They (illegal aliens) pay rent, buy groceries, buy clothes....what happens to your country's economy if 20 million people go away?"

That's a good question --- it deserves an answer. Over 80% of Americans want secured borders and illegal migration stopped.But what would happen if all 20 million vacated America?

In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico, it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems, bankrupted hospitals and overrun prisons.

It would leave highways cleaner, safer and less congested. Everyone
could understand one another as English became the dominant language again.

In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and
grandkids would move back "home," mostly to Mexico .

That would save Coloradans an estimated $2 billion annually in taxes
that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration
costs. It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone.

Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens. Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered death, accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.

Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67 percent drop out/flunk out rate via thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41 different languages. At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from our gridlocked cities in Colorado .

In Florida, 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State back to America, the rule of law and English.

In Chicago, Illinois, 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free experience.


If 20 million illegal aliens returned "home," the US economy would
return to the rule of law. Employers would have to hire legal American citizens at a living wage.

Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they wouldn't be working off the books. That would result in an additional $400 billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local state and city coffers.

No more push '1' for Spanish or '2' for English.

No more confusion in American schools that now must content with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids. Our overcrowded schools would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.

We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country. In cities like L.A. , 20,000 members of the " 18th Street Gang" would vanish from our nation.

No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans. No more foreign rapists and child molesters. Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our crowded highways and gridlock. Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American deaths by illegal aliens.

Over $80 billion annually wouldn't return to their home countries by cash transfers. Illegal immigrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America 's economy.

At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, which cost us $109 billion per year per cycle.

At least 86 hospitals in California , Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being bankrupted out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act. Americans wouldn't suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country --- brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders.

Our cities would see 10 million less people driving, polluting and grid locking our cities. It would also put the "secular progressives" on the horns of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11 percent of our greenhouse gases.


Over one million of Mexico 's poorest citizens now live inside and along our border from Brownsville , Texas to San Diego , California in what the New York Times called, "colonias" or new neighborhoods.

The trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without sewage, clean water, streets, electricity, roads or any kind of sanitation. The New York Times reported them to be America 's new " Third World " inside our own country.

Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect 50 million residents of those colonias. (I've seen them personally in Texas and Arizona; it's sickening beyond anything you can imagine.) By enforcing our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico .

We invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own countries and/or
make a better life in Mexico.

We invite a million people into our country legally, more than all other
countries combined annually.

We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy within our borders and growing lawlessness at every level in our nation.

It's time to stand up for our borders, our language and our culture, and our way of life.

Rita Lingwood is a practicing attorney in Citrus Heights, California.
Sources for the data in this column can be found on the Center for Immigration Studies website

http://www.cis.org/

Well what do you think?
*************************************************************************************
FLASH!
Cleveland Magazine has come out with the June issue that carries "Rating the Suburbs"
Painesville has managed to jump from 76th[dead last] to the 35th...WOW! what an improvement.
What did we do so different? Technical Resue Vehicle? New Police Chief? New E.M.S. squad?
Maybe it was something simple like investing in a "Painesville Magazine" published by the same people who do Cleveland Magazine.
If this is how it works I cannot blame any city official for last years results. The question should be is publishing Painesville Magazine a bribe, or blackmail?
What doi you think?

11 Comments:

At June 8, 2010 at 2:29 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its amazing what $3,500 dollars will do today.
If we make it a monthly will get into the top5!

 
At June 8, 2010 at 6:29 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Haven't seen the paper copy of the mag yet, but checked it out on-line. The ratings are broken down into 5 catagories (education, safety, walkability, taxes and housing)....here's Pville's scores following that order: 51...35%...83.7%...%1,780.00...$91,700.00. I don't know how many communities were included, I guess I'll have to find the whole article.

http://www.clevelandmagazine.com/ME2/dirsect.asp?sid=8742D85F320A46E1B4C566DFB94476D6&nm=Rating+The+Suburbs

 
At June 9, 2010 at 12:56 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting now IMMIGRATION has all at once become a main issue for Republicans?

They controlled the court, the congress and the presidency for 6 years....and the court and congress for 12 years.....Did they ever ONCE bring ANY immigration bill to the floors of congress???

 
At June 9, 2010 at 2:03 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

G@#%^$*@ Term, you are an A&^*#$@.
I hope Cleveland Mag. comes after you for your comment.
[censored comment]

 
At June 9, 2010 at 2:09 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

I hope they contact me also. I want it explained and understood how and why we made a 41 city jump? Either 2009 was wrong or 2010 is wrong. We didn't do that much different did we?
They have lost all credibility with me.
Did they compare apples to apples or was something else included?

 
At June 9, 2010 at 6:47 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

You hope they contact you?
What a joke. You complain when the city progressed to from 76 to 35, but ripped when Painesville was last. Youre the kind of person who is never happy...About anything. Your comment "They have lost all credibility with me" is a hoot. I really don't think they give a flying fig about what you think.
And why so harsh on the PD & FD. The PD chief is new and if the FD had old, worn & outdated equipment, youd rag about that.
Terminally unhappy - now I know what Term means!

 
At June 9, 2010 at 6:49 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think we would all like to know why the change in status.

2:03 p.m. can you explain why we jumped up the list in one short year?

Wonder what Rocky River is paying?

 
At June 10, 2010 at 7:45 AM , Anonymous Alice said...

To 6:47....the joke is on us...that our leaders could finagle this little publicity stunt and think no one would catch it. The big money they've wasted on projects like AMP-Ohio and the little money they've thrown after it to make us feel good about it would have been much better spent on our hard-working and deserving safety forces. Maybe they don't care about public opinion...but they should...we're the ones paying the tab.

 
At June 10, 2010 at 1:34 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

6:47 I'm happy we went from 76 to 35 in safety my question is how? Again either last year they rated us to low or this year to high? How do you jump over 41 communities? Last year I was told that they used obsolete figures am I to believe there using the right ones now.
Now tell me did you have credibility this year or last year.
Nice try about being harsh on the safety forces. My problem is not with them they do an great job. My problem is with a very unqualified safety director, that doesn't seem listen to reason.

 
At June 11, 2010 at 1:08 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's really scary about the article by Rita Lingwood, is that that was written in 2007! Everything has had three years to get much, much worse.

I heard someone from the government -- Homeland Security guy, I think -- saying that we did a Mexican-trucks-across-America thing. I only caught it briefly, but I think he said that they had a coordinated effort of stopping Mexican trucks all across America and made a huge drug haul (probably weapons, too). Now why wasn't this all over our news and newspapers? People need to know what the hell is going on with the Mexicans and the other illegals. It's time to bring it all out in the open.

Isn't it outrageous how angry the Mexican President is? Saying he intends to get justice and safety for the Mexican immigrants. You know, these people hate us anyway. They're just tolerating us -- barely -- until they take over our country. I'm glad he and they are starting to show their true colors. I say so what. Go ahead and hate us. Who cares? And while you're at it, get your sorry butts back to Mexico and stay there, and get away from our borders, too.

 
At June 11, 2010 at 7:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Arizona is going to try to take on the anchor baby issue! We all have to make sure we let Arizona know that we support them.

I hope to God that our government supports the border patrol agents who were involved in the two incidences lately at the border. They better back them up.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home