Friday, May 21, 2010

"Electric Avenue" eddie grant

An interesting story has come to light and may explain what AMP-OHIO was up to and why with concerns to Painesville.


Power plant closing at end of ’10
AMP-Ohio deal with EPA forces decision; 90 jobs at stake

By Brad Bauer and Evan Bevins, The Marietta Times


ART SMITH The Marietta Times
The 60-year-old Richard H. Gorsuch Generating Station, an American Municipal Power facility located along Ohio 7 near the Eramet-Marietta plant, will be shut down by the end of this year as a result of a settlement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department that alleged violations of the U.S. Clean Air Act.


American Municipal Power's Richard H. Gorsuch Generating Station near Marietta will be shuttered by the end of the year as part of a settlement to resolve alleged clean air violations.

The settlement, with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department, called for the plant to be shut down by the end of 2012, but AMP-Ohio said in a Wednesday afternoon release that Dec. 15 would be the last day of operation.

"Continuing to invest money to ensure safe plant operations does not make sense given the fact that the consent decree will mandate shutdown in 2012," the release says.

The Gorsuch plant employs approximately 90 people, said Kent Carson, AMP-Ohio spokesman. The facility, built in 1951 as part of the Union Carbide complex, is located just south of Marietta on Ohio 7, across from Eramet-Marietta.

In its release, AMP-Ohio said the closure had nothing to do with the local workforce.

"We are very appreciative of the Gorsuch staff and the dedication they have shown through the years," AMP President and CEO Marc Gerken says in the release. "Unfortunately, the current situation makes retiring the plant the only reasonable business decision."

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency filed suit against AMP in April 2009, alleging the coal-fired plant violated pollution standards for years through improper upgrades and maintenance on the nearly 60-year-old facility. According to the suit, the work violated the spirit of the U.S. Clean Air Act, which was aimed at reducing emissions by phasing-out the nation's oldest and dirtiest power plants.

Although older plants like the Gorsuch station are exempt from the newer standards, the Clean Air Act requires older plants to undergo a permitting process for any major modification. Any improvements would subject the plant to the same regulations as newer facilities. The EPA claimed the modifications made to the plant - some of them before AMP Ohio owned it - were made without meeting the new standards.

AMP-Ohio maintains that the plant remained in compliance with its operating permits.

"It's important to understand that when considering modifications at a generating facility, the (EPA) is not only looking at whether the modifications actually increased emissions, but also whether they had the potential to increase emissions," AMP Vice President of Generation Operations Mike Perry says in the company's release. "AMP has responsibly operated the facility since taking ownership, and we have made a number of improvements at the facility that have actually reduced emissions."

As part of the settlement, AMP-Ohio must also spend $15 million on an environmental mitigation project and pay a civil penalty of $850,000, according to court documents filed Tuesday. The release says this is expected to result in the creation of 30 new jobs, but Carson said they will not be in this area.

According to the release, the station will continue operating all four boilers during the peak summer demand period, then reducing to two boilers through mid-December. Plant staff will be reduced after the summer peak.

When the suit was brought, AMP-Ohio officials said they intended to take the Gorsuch plant off line in 2014, once construction was completed on a new multibillion-dollar, coal-fired plant that was set to open in Meigs County. However, last fall, the organization announced their plans to move forward with the Meigs project had been scrapped after project costs came in higher than expected.

At that time, AMP-Ohio officials said they would "re-evaluate" their earlier plans to close Gorsuch.

Although it was known the plant might be shut down in the near future, Washington County Commissioner Cora Marshall said Wednesday's news was "sad to hear."

"(It) affects not only the workers but everyone in our area," she said.

AMP-Ohio says in the release it has a fully funded pension fund for plant retirees, and the organization will work with existing employees to make sure they're aware of job training and other available resources.

The plant's loss will be felt by local government as well since it provides more than $500,000 a year in taxes in the county, about $317,000 of that going to the Warren Local School District, according to Washington County Auditor Bill McFarland. The district board of education called a special meeting for 8 a.m. today to discuss the impact of the impending closure on a planned bond issue scheduled to be decided in an August special election.

AMP-Ohio says in its release that the site might be considered for a gas peaking project, to help provide additional power during peak usage periods, but no decision has been made. That operation would require fewer workers, and Carson said it was too early to say whether some current employees could fill those jobs.

The electricity generated at Gorsuch serves just under 50 member communities, mostly in northern Ohio and none in this area, Carson said.

However, it still provides energy and steam to plants in the area, including Eramet. AMP-Ohio purchased controlling interest in the power plant in 1988 from Elkem Metals, which became Eramet.

Eramet spokeswoman Joy Frank-Collins said she expects the Gorsuch closure will have minimal impact on Eramet.

"We're already planning on alternatives, so I don't expect that it will have a big impact," she said.

AMP-Ohio says in its release that steam and water customers were notified in 2006 that AMP was unable to renew existing contracts and cessation of operations was likely.

According to the EPA, the Gorsuch Generating Station has the potential to emit more than 100 tons per year each of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and particulate matter. The EPA's 2008 Toxic Release Inventory said the Gorsuch plant disposed of on-site or otherwise emitted a total of 1.4 million pounds of chemicals.

Federal EPA officials did not return telephone calls for comment Wednesday. The U.S. Justice Department issued a press release calling the settlement a victory.

"The Justice Department is committed to strong enforcement of our nation's environmental laws in order to protect human health and the environment," Ignacia S. Moreno, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's Environment and Natural Resources Division, says in the release. "This settlement will remove harmful emissions from this coal-fired power plant by tens of thousands of tons each year and will significantly benefit air quality."

According to the press release, AMP's commitment to retire the plant will reduce nitrogen oxide emissions in the area by approximately 3,160 tons per year.

AMP, based in Columbus, is a nonprofit organization that provides generation, transmission, and distribution of wholesale electric power to municipal electric systems. AMP is made up of 129 member municipal communities in five states.

The proposed settlement was lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio and is subject to a 30-day public comment period and final court approval.

They don't seem too concerned where to find the electric power to replace this plant; probably on the open market.
Now remember how imperative it was to get the Meigs County plant up and running, so important that they sent the president of AMP Ohio to a Painesville Council meeting to approve that deal. My question: "Was the city manager and council president aware that this plant was being scuttled..and was that what the rush was all about?

22 Comments:

At May 22, 2010 at 6:10 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I will remain anonymous, but you should ask our council if they know how soon the Painesville plant will quit generating because of EPA regs, it may be sooner than any of you realize, and then watch what happens to our electric rates.

 
At May 22, 2010 at 10:19 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rita already answered that in the news-paper. We will need additional power by 2012 remember?
JaHada and her both most have known the real question should be who are they looking out for? The people of Painesville or Amp-Ohio.

 
At May 22, 2010 at 10:44 AM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

6:10 I have asked that question at a council meeting and was given a very vague answer. No one really knows?
Maybe the plasnt life could be prolonged if we switched to natural gas? [more costly]

 
At May 22, 2010 at 10:59 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

So what if they knew? There job is to insure power for the people of Painesville.

 
At May 22, 2010 at 12:04 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Term asks if the city manager and council president knew that the Meigs plant was going to be scuttled and was that what all the rush was about? I think that the answer to that is that it could be. The one thing that we know is that we cannot trust them to do what is right for us or to give us honest, complete information. Since I have moved to this city, I cannot tell you how many times the words "is this corruption?" have come across my mind. It just has seemed so many times that shady things are going on. Then you have to wonder what is in it for them?

And I still can't believe that I seem to be the only one upset that we got into a deal with AMP Ohio for that landfill deal that will cost us thousands to power one house so we could have "pretend" green energy.

I'm telling you, it just makes me wonder if someone is on AMP's payroll. Thank goodness we are finally working with a new company that seems to have good, honest ideas and proposals -- something that makes sense for a change.

 
At May 22, 2010 at 1:45 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

The question I want to ask did they know the Gorsuch plant was closing? Was that the reason for the rush.
As far as your question about corruption, I don't believe there is any just the fact that ONE person by Charter has all the control. Mrs. McMahon always seems to find the easiest solution to any problem and that is just plain mismanagement. The only control council has over the city manager is to hire or fire them. Thats it! The Painesville City Manager has ZERO oversight.
This was accomplished with the help of a lazy underpaid council who's attitude seems to be let her handle it.

 
At May 22, 2010 at 3:39 PM , Anonymous Tired of lies said...

Here we go again. Wheres your proof? Flock, Cimaglo, Miller Tibbetts they all claim some kind of misdeed with AmpOhio but have no proof. We owe them millions, where's the bill? I can't wait for these people to be sitting in the dark complaining.
The leaders of council along with the city manager should take this bunch to court and sue them til it hurts, and then run out of town. Most of us are just plain tired of all the lies. Putup or shutup!

 
At May 22, 2010 at 4:03 PM , Anonymous Kathy Sak said...

Underpaid city council? I believe city council positions should be voluntary. Then we'll see who really has the city's best interest at heart. They meet twice a month. They apparrently do no research on city business prior to meetings, as they never seem informed on the business at hand. They ask a few questions, sometimes, but even when they don't get informative answers they still vote yes, or with the popular position of the evening. What exactly are we paying for? Why not just cut to the chase, do away with all city council members and let the city manager run the show. Seems sometimes it's that way now anyway.

 
At May 22, 2010 at 6:10 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

Underpaid, Yes Kathy in this world you get what you paid for. The city should be looked upon as a large corporation what the budget 72 to 870 million dollars and you want this to be voluntary? That is why no one shows any interest in running. Ask the candidates what some paid top their campaigns. I believe better people would come forward to run.
Although your second comment makes more sense do away with council they rarily ever challenge the administration. When that bill comes from AMP-OHIO we will have wished we had competent members on council when that vote was taken. We didn't learn our lesson the last time council let the administration lose a great some of money.
Sorta like this blog. your getting what you paid for.

 
At May 22, 2010 at 6:26 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

Just want to see if anyones paying attention 80 million not 870 million atleast not yet.
again you get what you pay for.

 
At May 22, 2010 at 6:30 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Will we be subject to paying this fine?

 
At May 23, 2010 at 1:25 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Tired of Lies: We do owe AMP-OHIO a lot of money. A lot of money. Just because the city manager isn't telling us how much and council is letting her get away with it, doesn't mean that the bill will not come and be huge. It's people like you who aren't listening and letting them get away with murder that helps make all this mismanagement with our money possible. Check the facts, Tired, and get ready to pull out your wallet. I asked both new council people to get this information for us, and to get us into the AMP meetings, but neither thing happened. I'm afraid you are the one who is going to look foolish. I suggest you get informed and start listening to what is going on. You should be calling for Rita's head, along with all the others. They have all let us go this long without the actual price or a darn good estimate, which I am sure is available by now. Last I knew, they were trying to roll everything over into a new deal with AMP so they wouldn't have to actually give us the figures of how much they lost for us. Those are the facts as I know them. Term can correct me if I am wrong. You're probably voting for these people, too. Really, get informed.

 
At May 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM , Anonymous Alice said...

To 10:59...you're right...so what if they knew! One would hope that our leaders would be well-informed...What's important is what they DO with the info. I sincerely hope that they've learned from AMP-Ohio's experience with an older power plant. The EPA's regulations aren't going to go away, so what do we do when Painesville's plant needs expensive upgrades that will have to follow government specifications and will no doubt cost a bundle? There will come a point in time of diminishing returns. We need a cohesive energy plan long before then. A very careful analysis of which way (or combination) to go should be done now. I have always preferred a good offense over a reactive defense (even though I'm a Browns fan) :(
We are fortunate to have the municipal plant because it gives us a selling point today for residents and businesses and provides a window to move into the future. Higher energy costs are inevitable for everyone, just how much will be relative to what you were paying and how well you planned for the future.
Here are some of my questions:
-Does the present city administration have an idea of what the plant will need to stay compliant and operational and for how long?
-What thought has been given to what the city will do when Painesville can no longer sustain owning it? (The investigation of green technology is a good first step).
-What energy legacy are they preparing to leave...meaning what are they leaving future administrations to work with?
And a final comment: Although I don't believe there are any electric power PhDs residing in town, that does not mean that average citizens don't have good ideas on what to do. Sometimes thinking outside the box offers creative ideas that the experts are just too close to the situation to see.

 
At May 23, 2010 at 7:56 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Alice, You must be from Wonderland.
The legacy that this administration and council will leave is they got in bed with a group of people Amp-Ohio who were self serving and the people that voted yes for Meigs County were either duped or lied to by JaHada and McMahon. You won't notice it to much Amp will give the city plenty of time to pay it back.
My only hope is that the people tie this decision directly to JaHada and McMahon and finally realize how incompetent they both are. They both were given plenty of good advice.
What they will leave future administrators is simple A BILL.

 
At May 23, 2010 at 6:07 PM , Anonymous Alice said...

to 7:56....Can't argue with you at all except I don't live in Wonderland but in WonderVille; wondering what's really going on and wondering how much longer we will put up with (or can afford) the present administration. Can't argue with 1:25's comments either...we DO owe a lot of money and I find it hard to believe that an accurate accounting can't be had by now. And to 'Tired of lies'; as far as Term and his fellow activists being sued...do you really think the city wants to be closely scrutinized on any of this? There's absolutely nothing wrong with asking questions, getting information or forming an educated opinion. I don't hear any denials or reasonable explanations being offered ...

 
At May 24, 2010 at 11:46 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree, Alice, that the city would not want to be closely scrutinized on any of this.

Term said previously that he doesn't think there is any corruption going on in this city. I'll just say again that since I moved here, it just seems like one shady thing after the other, and I have no such confidence.

 
At May 24, 2010 at 2:08 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

When you mention corruption I think of envelope deals and greased palms, kickbacks and so forth. Sorry don't see it.
One deal I just can't get a good answer on was the land[in the swamp] along Richmond St. We paid more for our share [$250,000] then the developer paid for all the land in the first place. It will be near impossible to do anything with that land, and when questioned I was told the city had to purchase the land or the county would redirect the money?
I believe the city has not answered this question and it will linger as long as they don't and that I fear is where thinking like 11:46 mentioned comes from.
I have been told everytime the city asks for money there will be adds taken out with a piture of the land with a pricetag on it, asking was this fisical responsibility?

 
At May 24, 2010 at 10:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

In response to Term's 2:08 post:

Okay, maybe we should just start at that swamp land, and all other real estate purchases and sales by the city and all members of city council, etc., past and present. I would like to see investigations start there. It seems to me that there are a lot of people around town who have questions in that area.

 
At May 25, 2010 at 5:45 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The answer to your question Term is YES.
Ms. McMahon and Council knew that the Gorsuch Plant would close when the new coal plant (AMPGS) opened.

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY – OCTOBER 1, 2007 – 7:30 PM

Ms. McMahon stated the City participated in the Gorsuch Plant, however that plant is scheduled to
close and the AMPGS plant is to open and be ready to purchase power from. The City will have ownership
interest in the plant.
Mr. Horvath stated this piece of legislation will be left on second reading.

http://www.painesville.com/vertical/Sites/%7B66FDE066-2B9A-43E2-8DFC-2129003D50A7%7D/uploads/%7BBC2E5787-3D46-4997-95B3-53B586AC91CB%7D.PDF

 
At June 4, 2010 at 1:52 PM , Anonymous OBERLIN JOE said...

What you and the residents of Painesville as well as all 129 members of AMP is how and where will they get the 15 million dollars in environmental mitigation, as well as the $850,000 fine? They have only one revenue source... YOU!

 
At June 7, 2010 at 1:51 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why worry about the small stuff I understand there is a eatery servimg Mexican fare downtown that is behind on its utility bills. Rita maybe you should put them on a payment plan?

 
At June 8, 2010 at 6:02 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

ONE SIMPLE QUESTION.....HOW MUCH DO WE OWE AMP-OHIO?

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home