"MORE MORE MORE" bananarama
More, more, more
How do you like it ,how do you like it
WM
This is for unlimited, recycling, yard waste and fall leaf collection combined.
Amounts shown for all 7 years of this contract.
1- 17.99
2- 18.44
3- 18.90
4- 19.37
5- 19.86
6- 20.35
7- 20.86
REPUBLIC
1-17.29
2-17.81
3-18.35
4-18.89
5-19.48
6-20.14
7-20.84
WM BAG
1-2.25
2-2.31
3-2.36
4-2.42
5-2.48
6-2.55
7-2.61
REPUBLIC BAG
1-4.25
2-4.35
3-4.50
4-4.65
5-4.80
6-4.95
7-5.10
Quite a difference in Low volume bag service.
I guess what amazes me is in seven years we are still cheaper than we are today?
Also without recycling WM is cheaper by the month. (example) $17.38 WM-
$18.13 REPUBLIC
No one claimed this would be easy.
"99 percent of all statistics only tell 49 percent of the story"
RON DELEGGE
"Price ain't merely about numbers. It's a satisfying sacrifice"
TOBA BETA
posted by terminator1 @ 11:05 AM
7 Comments
7 Comments:
This is what happens when John Q Public opens his mouth and opens a can of worms.
Looks like seniors, and low volume users, would be getting a bad deal with Republic. They might as well use a container. Also, anyone know what Republics customer service reputation is like? Any way, I see no reason to change providers. I only see a reason to move away from a city, that forces it`s citizens to pay for anything they may not want or need! I wonder if Painesville will still get free service plus a kick back? Do as I say, not as I do...
8:08 In the end it will be council that makes the final decision. I understand the process but how does something that cost $3.90 in June only cost $2.25 in July? I have let you all know my distain for WM but whatever is in the best interest of ALL resident's also counts.
The city administration should be congratulated for the work that went into this bidding process. No doubt more went into this time than 5 years ago. Who again handled that?
In good faith WM could have thrown resident's a bone two years ago. They choose not too. Might now come back to bite them?
Question, do you know why the family in the headstone controversy is suing the city of Painesville? Painesville had already said they could keep the monument as it is. So why now are they suing? Trying to get a settlement of some kind and profit from this situation?
10:51 I haven't a clue. But once attorney's get involved it's just a matter of time.
Even after the city capitulated to the family wishes seeking a solution now it seems more then headstone is in play.
Painesville has an obligation that a situation like this doesn't occur again.
The hard part is now to determine what on any headstone is "obscene" not as easy as it sounds.
I hope the family intention is honorable and not have anything to do with a financial gain.
His and your wishes were granted. Go in peace.
waste management's contract is the better of the two that you have shown us. Problem is some of your comments about WM and that $98,000 has poison the water and this administration doesn't want the lowest and best they want this issue to just be forgotten.
I have learned council could give a rat's A## who get's the contract. Just as soon just drop it in the manager's lap. Such conviction
I have to think that 10:57 is onto something here.
When the news of the extra $96K "tax" became known, the Administration was likely none too pleased.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home