Tuesday, March 8, 2016

"AUTUMN LEAVES" nat king cole



The falling leaves Drift by the window

The autumn leaves of red and gold

LEAVES

As we were informed at the last council meeting the city administration has decided to no longer pick-up the autumn leaves due to a problem with a truck? This service will now be included in the price you pay for the rubbish pick-up?
Now I didn't think this city  ala carte list was kosher. For as long as I can remember leaves in 2015, 2005, 1999, 1984 and 1971 were the city responsibility. Something we paid for in our property and/or income tax?

Read this carefully and see if you come to the same conclusion that I did.

955.18 Yard Waste

The city shall itself or by contract, provide for the collection and disposal of leaves, brush and tree branches less than four inches in diameter and forty-eight inches in length and holiday trees on specified days in the manner designated by the Director.

Ord. 8-99
Passed 06/21/99
Ord. 24.07
Passed 12/03/07

My contention is that nowhere in the 955 rubbish ordinance the city included leaves .brush in the ordinance? It has been the responsibility of the city for years., and reading this with the word "itself" and the proceeding coma falls not under resident responsibility but the city.
Is this another case of the city wanting to provide less services and collecting the same amount of  tax money?

Look the ordinance gives the city the right to contract rubbish pick-up from resident's nothing else!

When I asked Law Director Joseph Gurley all he stated was "he would look into it."

Well council can if they wish amend the ordinance by vote letting resident's know this is another item they can pay for. My hope is the word brush, as well as yard waste, and leaves do not become part of the next contract scam by a refuse company and the city.

The city's obligation is to find the best contract for resident's NOT to enrich  themselves!

What  next put snowplows on the front of the garbage trucks and add street snowplowing to your rubbish contract?

Update;

City decides to "lay more pipe on to Painesville resident's"

One thing you can always count on in Painesville are very poor estimations!

Now remember that $8.00 surcharge on your monthly water bill? Well that brings in $1,200,000.00 into the water department yearly. AS it was explained at a council meeting the city was going to spend $10,000,000.00 on a new water line and crib interest-free out into Lake Erie. The financing would work kind of like this $600,000.00 a year to pay for the line and $600,000.00 to repair waterlines in our water district area. Well the estimates are not coming in anywhere close to 10 million closer to 16 million. You guessed it,  throws a monkey wrench into the formula. maybe $900,000.00 into the water intake line and $300,000.00 into new city infrastructure. The city is looking at saving some money by making the water intake 300- 400 yards shorter. So could it had been shorter in the first place? One promise I can make you that $8.00 surcharge will never ever go away.

More rubbish tomorrow as well as Housing Task Force leave's port today at 5:00 pm!

Hey, is there another Republican debate coming up soon? I need to hear some new 'Dick' jokes. WOW Thought I'd never type those words.

In a country that prides itself on it's democratic voting policies isn't it way passed the time that we got rid of Caucuses' ? flipping coins, forcing people to drive  to another county, listening to speakers just please let people vote!
Someone if they can explain this to me. Today both Michigan and Idaho vote in primaries. Michigan has close to 10 million people living in the state with 59 delegates at stake. Idaho with a little over 1.6 million people has 32 delegates at stake. What do the potato's get a vote? Help me with the math?

8 Comments:

At March 8, 2016 at 10:31 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think you should retread your post. The law states that it is the city who should pick up all yard waste that includes leaves,branches,ect . It also gives them the right to contract out. Which is what they have done. I see no problem with this other than they are cutting services we get from the city

 
At March 8, 2016 at 10:52 AM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

10:31 it reads the city shall itself or by contract. A contract with the city not with it's resident's. That's the way I read it.
They can contract it out and pay for it.
It will be interesting how Mr. Gurley esq. reads it?
Now should they be allowed to cut services?

 
At March 8, 2016 at 12:00 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

Mr. Carson sent me information from Mr. Gurley.

Tony, At last night's meeting a visitor inquired about the meaning of the above captioned Painesville ordinance. (955.18) It is my opinion that your response to same was legally correct.
Joe Gurley

Well I emailed him back I disagree

 
At March 8, 2016 at 12:23 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Look, you are about the biggest and only Tony Carson supporter. There needs to be some way for the city to make money at the residents expense. What you should be doing is publicizing his contract - noting all the perks and bonuses council allowed him by voting for it. Next look at the others contracts and see what all they got by contract. Again, pushed forward by the city manager and approved by council. Anyone with a brain knows when you negotiate you do not give away the town. This has been done and now we have a huge money problem. Why council didn't go over everything with a fine tooth comb and allowed such frivolous spending? But you don't seem to be concerned with overspending, only what hurts your wallet personally.

 
At March 8, 2016 at 12:40 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

12:23 How did it become my responsibility? No the city must learn to live within it's means. As far as his contract do we know it's not inline with other city managers with the same responsibility?
Sounds like your problem is more with council's and not the city manager?

And to finish all overspending hurt's everyone's wallet in Painesville. Not just mine personally!

 
At March 9, 2016 at 12:23 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Because you make it your responsibility when the problem directly involves you. Just by reading what you post we can see that you don't really campaign for the community, but self-centered for yourself.

 
At March 9, 2016 at 1:44 PM , Blogger Ricochet said...

I read the legislation the same way. The city may collect yard waste, or at their expense, they may contract it out. Not at our expense! We pay way too much for garbage disposal as it is! One question;What is a holiday tree?

 
At March 10, 2016 at 8:46 AM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

12:23 Gee I didn't realize I was the only customer Waste Management had in the city? Neither did I realize I was the only one getting power from Prairie State? Also even though I don't have a connection with any student at Heritage I ask for an SRO? Please help me campaign for the community

1:44 Well unless you call your council people the three at-large as well as the ward council people this will pass. You don't have to be a genius to realize the city is again shrieking from their responsibility.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home