Sunday, March 4, 2012

"START ME UP" rolling stones

This memo was sent to all members of Painesville City Council.
It just a start in some reform we wish council will address.

Dear members of Council,

Members of the Painesville Oversight Committee have attended the Painesville City budget meeting and also held a budget meeting of our own. Having spent many hours discussing the proposed budget document for 2012, we have a number of questions, concerns and suggestions.

Firstly we would like to commend everyone for their work in reducing their department's expenses over the last few years.

1. New General Purpose Car - $15,000 has been budgeted for a new vehicle for employees to use for day trips. That vehicle will also need to be maintained and insured. Our recommendation would be to setup an agreement with a local car rental company, and rent a car for those days. Enterprise rents a full size car for $40 per day with unlimited mileage. If used 60 times during the year, that amounts to $2400.

2. Cemetery Mowing - Our recommendation would be to put this out for a formal bid. There are many local landscaping companies that would love the opportunity to do this work. Have any companies been contacted in the past? Who were they? How much was the bid in each case?

3. General Fund Utilities - Can the Electric department give utilities to the general fund at a lower rate? Maybe even at no charge? If this is not possible, why not?

4. Shamrock Blvd Bridge - What is the total cost of the proposed Shamrock Blvd bridge? Who is paying for what portion? Does the city have to pay anything? If so, How much?

5. TIF - How much TIF money have we received in the past? Where was the past TIF money spent? How many more years will we receive TIF money? How much TIF money do we get every year? Does it specify in the TIF contract where the funds have to be spent? If so how much, on what? Could TIF money be used for road or sewer repairs?

6. Wage Increases - What are step increases and longevity increases? Why are we giving any increases at all.

7. Distribution of Expenditures - What change is being made in the distribution of expenditures for the fire fighters, community development personnel and city hall maintenance personnel?

8. Hospitalization - A large and growing portion of the budget is for hospitalization. From what we understand, the city is self insured. Have we had proposals from any health insurance companies? Have we considered joining with the county on their health care plan? If so what are the details?

9. Hospitalization - City employees are required to pay 14% of their health care costs. The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program requires employees to pay 33%. Private sector employees pay between 25% and 50%. Our recommendation would be to increase the employee's contribution to help offset the rising cost of healthcare.

10. Wages - Most private sector people who live in Painesville either lost their job or took significant reductions over the last four years. No city employee has taken any reduction in pay so far. Due to Painesville's current economic condition, you should consider the reduction of city employee salaries including department heads and the city manager. Even a small reduction, might have a big effect.

11. Failed Amp Ohio Project - During the city budget meeting, it was mentioned that we have $3 million dollars set aside to pay our portion of the debt. It was also mentioned that our owed amount is now below $2 million. Could we spend that difference on road repairs?

12. Roads - We think everyone would agree that the roads in the city of Painesville need a lot of repairs. This year's budget only allocates $100,000 for this task. We would recommend this number be more than $1 million. This money has to be found somewhere without laying off personnel from the police or fire departments.

Above we have touched on some questions, concerns and suggestions regarding the current budget document. Please consider these points and revise the budget to help improve Painesville's financial situation.

At this point we would not recommend approving the budget as it is stands today.



Yours sincerely

Members of the Painesville Oversight Committee.

10 Comments:

At March 4, 2012 at 10:01 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heard there was a shooting at Tony's Subway Inn?

 
At March 4, 2012 at 2:35 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

6, 8, 9, 10 sure sound a lot like SB 5. Oh, wait Term is a Dem, so now it is a good idea.

 
At March 4, 2012 at 4:00 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

2:35
Where in this post does it say Term?
This is what you get when you work with others. Not Terms way or the highway?

 
At March 4, 2012 at 5:08 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not related to this subject but the Painesville City School district is at it again. They are taking away busing for all private school students now that the year is half way over. Didn't they learn yet that it is cheaper to provide the busing then it is to educate all of these extra children? Here we go again.

 
At March 5, 2012 at 6:39 AM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

Watch the school board meeting . They show figures where it costs almost $250,000 to transport private school pupils. I see both sides and yet the parents of these students and taxpaying residents to the Painesville City Schools are only to receive $200.00 in travel expenses for the loss of the buses?
Do you think those parents will ever vote for another school levy?

 
At March 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I bet the majority of the kids that live in the city go to private schools. Don't try to take the busing away or the parents will not suport Public schools.

 
At March 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM , Anonymous Nancy Not So Nice said...

Really, who gives a fig about what you and your POCS think? You are a group of wannabes hanging around thinking you make a difference.
"At this point we would not recommend approving the budget" Again who cares what you and yours think? You are not on council and if the voters continue, your little friends won't be either.Can't wait to hear your little buddy, Murphy and his ridiculous proposal this evening too. Again, who cares, he lost he needs to build a bridge and get over it.

 
At March 5, 2012 at 3:47 PM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

Nancy you must be one of those Lemming people keep telling me about? Murphys bridge will be alot easier and cheaper then the one council proposes.

 
At March 6, 2012 at 12:35 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lemmings are not people they are animals. Really? You didn't know that?

 
At March 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The city has a contract with its workers. They have to finish that contract. Then renagociate a new contract. Your numbers are wrong about federal workers paying 33%.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home