Wednesday, August 15, 2012

"SUBSTITUTE" the who

Found a story on Galion Live and after reading it I thought if the resident's of Painesville would like to do the same thing with Painesville's Charter. Reading the story I almost get the impression that these two cities are close to a mirror image of each other.
Although I am not presently advocating this plan for Painesville I wonder how some of you view it.

Painesville will soon be reviewing the city charter . Guess who picks the reviewers?

Also it was refreshing to see that the powers to be have decided to reduce Galions electric rates.
********************************************************************************************


On Friday afternoon, GalionLive received the following update from the Galion City Charter Amendment Petition Committee. It is repeated here in its entirety and without changes of any kind.




August 3, 2012

Dear GalionLive,

Our Charter Amendment Petition Committee wants to take this opportunity to explain to the citizens of Galion, where we are at this point and what happens next.

The Amendment to abolish the Charter and return to a statutory (mayor) form of government will be on the November 6th General Election ballot. The Charter itself and the Ohio Constitution required City Council to put the Amendment on the ballot. Tuesday night (July 24), only Council Member Cathy George voted against the ballot legislation. George openly violated her oath of office, even after being informed by Council Member Wade, Council President Baldinger, and the Law Director (Reese Mills) that the Ohio Constitution required City Council to put the Amendment on the ballot.

The enthusiasm that our Charter Amendment Petition effort has received has been inspiring. We organized our group in May, started circulating Petitions in June, and now (in July) have the Charter Amendment to abolish the Charter on the November ballot. So many citizens have come forward to help with this effort. We have all received phone calls from citizens wanting to sign the Petition and others wanting to circulate a Petition. We obtained 830 signatures, and 676 of those were certified as valid. We only needed 267 valid signatures.

In November, only the Charter Amendment (i.e. abolishing the Charter) will be on the ballot, not the election of City officials. If we are successful in getting the Amendment passed, then the City government will continue in a ‘transitional phase’ while candidates circulate petitions to run for all of statutory offices (e.g. Mayor, Auditor, Treasurer, Law Director) with the election to be held next May. Instead of a City Manager as our City’s leader, a City Manager who now hires the Finance Director and the Law Director, Galion will now have a leadership team who have each been elected by the citizens and are each responsible to the citizens. And with this overlapping authority, the City will have better decisionmaking and a better ‘checks and balances’.

The statutory form of government will return the power to ‘hire and fire’ City officials to the citizens themselves; and thus, make City officials more accountable to the citizens of Galion. With the Charter, the City Manager is not elected by the citizens and it should be no surprise that the City Manager has not been responsive to the citizens of Galion. Furthermore, somehow the City Manager’s ‘you’re not my boss’ attitude concerning the citizens has also been adopted by some Council Members. Regularly, citizens with basic questions or valid complaints are treated poorly at City Council Meetings. Once a citizen has experienced that poor treatment or seen that happen to others, they recognize that their City government just does not care about its citizens. The Charter/City Manager form of government is just not a government of ‘the people’; the citizens have just lost control of their City government to a less responsive, less accountable City Manager form of government. When you approach your City government with a simple question, and you can’t get a straight answer, there is something seriously wrong; likewise, when you have a complaint, and your government leaders try to browbeat and intimidate you instead of listening to your concerns, there is something seriously wrong.

Our Charter Amendment to abolish the Charter is not a vendetta against the current City Manager. In the history of the Galion Charter, we have not had any City Manager who provided leadership for the City of Galion. Remember that goals of the Charter included providing professional leadership that would use consultants less, run the City better, and save the City money — that just never happened. And in the process a ‘good old boys club’ was created that just didn’t care about the citizens. The City Manager/Charter form of government lost sight of the fact that ‘they’ work for the citizens of Galion.

Now, we are definitely in the political back-stabbing phase. And we caution the voters not to get distracted by the personal attacks and intimidation tactics. Politics is like baseball; you need to keep your eye on the ball — in this case, keep your focus on the issue that the City Manager/Charter form of government has just been a failure for the City of Galion.

And, it is truly time for a change. This change back to a statutory (mayor) form of government puts control back in the hands of the citizens, requires City officials to live in the City of Galion, and has overlapping authority of officials (a better checks and balances). The Charter Amendment (to abolish the Charter) has been a “grass roots” effort of the citizens of Galion. As many people have said, we should have done this a long time ago.

Now that our Charter Amendment will be on the November election ballot, our Committee members are being contacted about yard signs, bumper stickers, and making donations. We want the public to know that we are in the process of setting up the required “ballot issue committee” and filing the necessary paperwork with the Board of Elections; all of that has to be done before we can accept donations and make expenditures in support of the Charter Amendment ballot issue. We will keep the public updated, as we should have all of this done very soon.

Lastly, we want to thank everyone who has helped to get the Charter Amendment on the ballot. And we look forward to working with all of the supporters on the campaign to pass the Amendment this November 6th. Be sure to mark your calendars.

Charter Amendment Committee:


Gina M. Powell

Donald P. Faulds

Shirley A. Clark

E. Roberta Wade



9 Comments:

At August 15, 2012 at 7:13 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh , I hope this does not happen in Painesville. Honestly, this city has a bunch of idiots voting. With the downhill spiral this city has been in for the last 15 years we still have people voting in the same group of people over and over.

We do not need these idiot voters now also electing a Mayor, and all those other positions.

The big difference is Painesville is a county seat and we get all the entitlement group of citizens. As long as our city leaders do nothing to piss them off,(like rental inspection) we will continue to repeat our past. Just image electing another whole group of leaders like these ones we have.

 
At August 15, 2012 at 7:27 AM , Blogger brew said...

I would agree with their move to elect a mayor or over having a city manager. Not sure that the other offices should be elected as opposed to letting the mayor suround themselves with people they are comfortable with.

 
At August 15, 2012 at 11:28 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have to ask - exactly WHO do you think would win an election as Mayor? Certainly not John Murphy. And probably not Andy Flock.

Just a reminder that when you try to get rid of what you appear to dislike (Rita and Joe) you may end up with a Mayor that won with majority votes (doesn't Joe usually garner the most votes?). Just because it's different does not mean it's better.

No mayor could capable of being professionally responsible for all that a City Manager does - this is why many government's with mayors STILL have a City administrator/manager.

 
At August 16, 2012 at 6:56 AM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

11:28 First I will agree and then I will disagree. If we changed the charter I agree we would probably get the same old same old. Although I think it would be a tose up between Hada and Flock.

Now the disagreement. The city manager surrounds herself with department heads that make between $75,000 and $90,000 a mayor could do the same. Her expertise and leadership has brought us flooded basement and streets, rusty water with her solution being an extra $8.00 fee on your utility bill. This along with her recommendation to council of all these screwy AMP-OHIO deals. Sorry I'm trying to understand what does she does?
Plus where what happened to the hospital, along with now what to do with that site. Where is that Urgent Care Center promised to Painesville. Promised what 4 years ago with a new excuse yearly?
Red painted crosswalks and flowers ain't making it happen, along with dumping another $900,000 on Main St. {Remember none of this goes towards Veterans Park}

 
At August 17, 2012 at 4:25 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I personally feel Arlene Becks would generate the most votes..she could Painesville back on the map.. im sure we would be on the tv all the time!

 
At August 17, 2012 at 6:05 AM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

4:25 A little sarcasm? It does go to make the point the Ms. Becks has changed the charter more than public citizen in the last 50 years. We seem to be on TV an awful lot larely as it is.

 
At August 17, 2012 at 6:32 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

You have to remember that Rita is not the only person at the City. If you disagree with things, maybe it's solutions that have been created by all these highly paid directors and department heads. Yes, Rita is the last stop, but she also to some degree has to trust the "experts" that consult her on various things. Maybe that's where the mistakes are made?

As for the hospital site, I'm positive there's a lot more to it than just Rita's "fault". There's stuff happening behind the scenes - someone's playing games, and it's not Painesville. Maybe they should call the Clinic or UH and see if they'd like to put a urgent care in? Sounds like a better idea to me. Have you been to tri-point? Our family calls it "die-point"

 
At August 17, 2012 at 7:03 AM , Anonymous TERM>> said...

6:32 You make a valid point. Remember the only one that can hire or fire these directors is.... The City Manager.
Now you have a family kids in college and the one person that has your career is the city manager, heck they are going to go along with whatever she wants.just to get along.
Seems city hall got into a death bed with Lake Hospital Systems, who's responsible for that?

 
At August 20, 2012 at 2:09 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

In Galions position, everybody from city council to the mayor has to face thevoters be relected every two years.

Don't like what is going on toss them out.

Interesting they did lower the added surchage on electric rates after the state said it was OK. When asked directly where all the money is coming from to pay AMP for the stranded cost from the never built MEIGS county plant and PRAIRIE STATE ... just silence from all of them as if it doesn't exist.We are talking well in excess of 3,000,000 dollars and climbing every month.

http://community.galionlive.com/forum/topics/council-member-opposes-charter-abolition


 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home